Abstract
The effects of protein supplementation on the ratings of energy/fatigue, muscle soreness [ascending (A) and descending (D) stairs], and serum creatine kinase levels following a marathon run were examined. Variables were compared between recreational male and female runners ingesting carbohydrate + protein (CP) during the run (CP(During), n = 8) versus those that were consuming carbohydrate (CHO(During,)n = 8). In a second study, outcomes were compared between subjects who consumed CP or CHO immediately following exercise [CP(Post) (n = 4) versus CHO(Post) (n = 4)]. Magnitude-based inferences revealed no meaningful differences between treatments 24 h post-marathon. At 72 h, recovery [Δ((72 hr-Pre))] was likely improved with CP(During) versus CHO(During), respectively, for Physical Energy (+14 ± 64 vs -74 ± 70 mm), Mental Fatigue (-52 ± 59 vs +1 ± 11 mm), and Soreness(-D) (+15 ± 9 vs +21 ± 70 mm). In addition, recovery at 72 h was likely-very likely improved with CP(Post) versus CHO(Post) for Physical Fatigue, Mental Energy, and Soreness(-A). Thus, protein supplementation did not meaningfully alter recovery during the initial 24 h following a marathon. However, ratings of energy/fatigue and muscle soreness were improved over 72 h when CP was consumed during exercise, or immediately following the marathon.