Abstract
Background: Acorus calamus (sweet flag) is widely used in traditional medicine, yet its dermal safety profile remains insufficiently defined under modern regulatory standards. Objective: To comprehensively evaluate the skin irritation, corrosion, and sensitisation potential of A. calamus rhizome oil using new approach methodologies' (NAMs) test batteries under GLP conditions. Results: The A. calamus rhizome oil was predicted as a Category 2 skin irritant, non-corrosive and GHS Category 1B skin sensitiser. Chemical analysis revealed β-asarone as the major constituent (~40.75%). The reconstructed human epidermis models established reversible irritation without corrosion. Mechanistic concordance across the Direct Peptide Reactivity Assay, KeratinoSens™, and Human Cell Line Activation Test showed activation of the three key events of the skin sensitisation adverse outcome pathway. Using the "2-out-of-3" Defined Approach with the KE 3/1 sequential strategy allowed for hazard classification into GHS Category 1B. Quantitative risk modelling using SARA-ICE models and SCCS parameters yielded conservative safe-use concentrations ranging from 0.13 to 0.78% (w/w) for leave-on products and up to 7.46% (w/w) for rinse-off formulations. Conclusions: The combined evidence from the NAM-based assays showed that A. calamus rhizome oil is a moderate sensitiser and irritant but not corrosive, providing critical data for risk assessment and regulatory decision-making, which was previously unknown. The SARA-ICE PoD-derived safe-use concentrations provide guidance for cosmetic formulators to ensure consumer safety, particularly in leave-on applications such as face and hand creams, where sensitisation risk is highest. This study demonstrates the utility of NAMs for botanical safety assessment and regulatory decision-making.