Abstract
Background Psoriasis is a papulosquamous disease with variable morphology, distribution, severity, and course. Chronic plaque psoriasis, or psoriasis vulgaris, is the most common form of psoriasis. Present available preparations for mild to moderate chronic plaque psoriasis for topical use are local corticosteroids, coal tar, dithranol, tazarotene, calcipotriol, tapinarof, and calcineurin inhibitors. However, every preparation has its disadvantages. Calcipotriol, an active form of vitamin D, is available in topical form for dermatological use. Chronic plaque psoriasis is the chief medical use of calcipotriol for mild to moderate form. Methotrexate has dramatic results in psoriasis when used systemically. Now, topical formulation is being advocated in localized psoriasis, which is not associated with the side effects of the systemic form. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the effectiveness of topical calcipotriol and topical methotrexate on the basis of the psoriasis area severity index (PASI) in patients of chronic plaque psoriasis and compare their safety in terms of adverse effects. Methodology The total number of patients included in the study was 60. They were divided into two groups, with 30 patients each. One group was prescribed ointment calcipotriol 0.005% twice daily local application (Group C). The other group was prescribed methotrexate gel 1% twice daily local application (Group M). The patients were followed up on the fourth and eighth weeks, and at each time, thorough clinical examinations were conducted for all patients. The PASI score was calculated in each patient every time. Safety was assessed by biochemical parameters, and tolerability was assessed by the incidence of adverse effects. All the patients included in the study were investigated at baseline, fourth week, and eighth week. The data collected were transferred to a master chart and analyzed. Results For the patients in group C, the mean PASI score at 0 week was 5.93 ± 2.62, while at four weeks, the mean PASI score declined to 1.67 ± 1.13, and at eight weeks, the mean PASI score further declined to 0.67 ± 0.68. For the patients in group M, the mean PASI score at 0 week was 5.91 ± 2.22, while at four weeks, the mean PASI score declined to 1.91 ± 1.11, and at eight weeks, the mean PASI score further declined to 0.89 ± 0.72. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the mean PASI score at various time points when compared between the two groups (p-value = 0.761, 0.296, 0.079, respectively). Thus, both drugs seem to be effective in treating mild- to moderate-grade chronic plaque psoriasis. Most of the patients in both groups showed marked clearance of the lesions. However, there were six patients in the calcipotriol group showing complete clearance of the lesions having mild-degree plaque psoriasis, as compared to three patients in the methotrexate group. In the present study, based on the comparison of safety and tolerability, four out of 30 patients (13.3%) in the calcipotriol group suffered skin irritation, whereas six out of 30 patients (20%) in the methotrexate group complained of a burning sensation. The adverse effects seen in the patients were transient and mild. Conclusion Topical calcipotriol and methotrexate were effective in reducing lesions in patients with chronic mild to moderate plaque psoriasis. Both drugs were well tolerated with mild and transient adverse effects and did not alter hematological and biochemical parameters.