Neither injury induced macrophages within the nerve, nor the environment created by Wallerian degeneration is necessary for enhanced in vivo axon regeneration after peripheral nerve injury

Since the 1990s, evidence has accumulated that macrophages promote peripheral nerve regeneration and are required for enhancing regeneration in the conditioning lesion (CL) response. After a sciatic nerve injury, macrophages accumulate in the injury site, the nerve distal to that site, and the axotomized dorsal root ganglia (DRGs). In the peripheral nervous system, as in other tissues, the macrophage response is derived from both resident macrophages and recruited monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs). Unresolved questions are: at which sites do macrophages enhance nerve regeneration, and is a particular population needed.

Macrophages in the sciatic nerve are neither necessary nor sufficient to produce a CL response.

Ccr2 knock-out (KO) and Ccr2gfp/gfp knock-in/KO mice were used to prevent MDM recruitment. Using these strains in a sciatic CL paradigm, we examined the necessity of MDMs and residents for CL-enhanced regeneration in vivo and characterized injury-induced nerve inflammation. CL paradigm variants, including the addition of pharmacological macrophage depletion methods, tested the role of various macrophage populations in initiating or sustaining the CL response. In vivo regeneration, measured from bilateral proximal test lesions (TLs) after 2 d, and macrophages were quantified by immunofluorescent staining.

Peripheral CL-enhanced regeneration was equivalent between crush and transection CLs and was sustained for 28 days in both Ccr2 KO and WT mice despite MDM depletion. Similarly, the central CL response measured in dorsal roots was unchanged in Ccr2 KO mice. Macrophages at both the TL and CL, but not between them, stained for the pro-regenerative marker, arginase 1. TL macrophages were primarily CCR2-dependent MDMs and nearly absent in Ccr2 KO and Ccr2gfp/gfp KO mice. However, there were only slightly fewer Arg1+ macrophages in CCR2 null CLs than controls due to resident macrophage compensation. Zymosan injection into an intact WT sciatic nerve recruited Arg1+ macrophages but did not enhance regeneration. Finally, clodronate injection into Ccr2gfp KO CLs dramatically reduced CL macrophages. Combined with the Ccr2gfp KO background, depleting MDMs and TL macrophages, and a transection CL, physically removing the distal nerve environment, nearly all macrophages in the nerve were removed, yet CL-enhanced regeneration was not impaired. Conclusions: Macrophages in the sciatic nerve are neither necessary nor sufficient to produce a CL response.