Abstract
Background/Objectives: Small bowel tumors (SBTs) encompass a diverse range of tumor types, with benign tumors being the most prevalent. However, the incidence of malignant SBTs is increasing, particularly small bowel adenocarcinoma; this poses a diagnostic challenge for clinicians and radiologists due to the varied and nonspecific clinical and radiological presentations associated with SBTs. In fact, SBTs can present differently in emergencies, often mimicking inflammatory diseases or manifesting as complications such as intussusception, small bowel obstruction (SBO), intestinal ischemia, perforation, gastrointestinal bleeding, or metastatic disease. These tumors can remain asymptomatic for extended periods. Methods: We present a pictorial review on the role of imaging in evaluating SBTs, focusing on the emergency setting where diagnosis can be incidental. We also include some representative cases that may be useful for radiologists and residents in clinical practice. Results: Despite these challenges, contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) is usually the best modality to use in emergencies for evaluating SBTs, and in some cases, a diagnosis can be made incidentally. However, when possible, multimodal imaging through cross-sectional imaging remains crucial for the non-invasive diagnosis of SBTs in stable patients, as endoscopic procedures may also be impractical. A complementary CT study with distension using negative oral contrast media, such as water, polyethylene glycol, or mannitol solutions, can improve the characterization of SBTs and rule out multiple SBT locations, particularly in small bowel neuroendocrine tumor (NET) and gastrointestinal tumor (GIST) localization. Positive water-soluble iodine-based oral contrast, such as Gastrografin (GGF), can be used to evaluate and monitor the intestinal lumen during the nonsurgical management of small bowel obstruction (SBO) or in suspected cases of small bowel perforations or the presence of fistulas. Magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) can aid in improving the characterization of SBTs through a multiplanar and multisequence study. Positron emission tomography combined with CT is generally an essential modality in evaluating metastatic disease and staging and assessing tumor prognosis, but it has limitations for indolent lymphoma and small NETs. Conclusions: Therefore, the integration of multiple imaging modalities can improve patient management and provide a preoperative risk assessment with prognostic and predictive indicators. In the future, radiomics could potentially serve as a "virtual biopsy" for SBTs, allowing for better diagnosis and more personalized management in precision medicine.