Painful patellar clunk or crepitation of contemporary knee prostheses

现代膝关节假体引起的髌骨疼痛性弹响或摩擦音

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Painful patellar clunk or crepitation (PCC) is a resurgent complication of contemporary posterior-stabilized TKA. The incidence, time to presentation, causes, and treatment of PCC still remain controversial. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore (1) compared the incidence of PCC with five contemporary TKA designs, (2) evaluated the time to presentation, (3) identified possible etiologies, and (4) determined recurrence rate and change in knee functional scores after treatment for PCC. METHODS: We reviewed 580 patients who had 826 posterior-stabilized TKAs involving five different designs. The incidences of PCC were compared among the prostheses. The knees were divided into two groups depending on the development of PCC, and possible etiologic factors of PCC, including prosthesis design and surgical or radiographic variables, were compared between groups. We investigated the onset time of PCC and evaluated treatment results by knee outcome scores. Minimum followup was 2.0 years (mean, 3.9 years; range, 2.0-9.8 years). RESULTS: The PCC incidence was higher in the Press-Fit Condylar(®) Sigma(®) Rotating Platform/Rotating Platform-Flex Knee System (11 of 113 knees, 9.7%) than in the others (seven of 713 knees, 1.0%). Increased risk of PCC was associated with using a specific prosthesis and patellar retention. PCC occurred in all cases within a year after TKA (mean, 7.4 months). Arthroscopic treatment (16 knees) and patellar replacement (two knees) improved knee scores, with no recurrence observed over an average followup of 29 months. CONCLUSIONS: Prosthesis design and patellar retention were associated with PCC. Surgery resolved the PCC.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。