Abstract
Over the last decade, a number of clinical trials have reported effects of chronic treatment with intranasal oxytocin on autistic symptoms but with inconsistent findings. Autism is a heterogeneous disorder and one factor which may influence treatment outcome is whether a subtype of individuals is more sensitive to oxytocin. In a recent cross-over trial on 41 young autistic children we reported that 44% showed a reliable improvement in clinical symptoms (Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, ADOS-2) after a placebo-controlled, 6-week intranasal oxytocin intervention where treatment was given every other day followed by a period of positive social interaction. In the current re-assessment of the data, we used an unsupervised data-driven cluster analysis approach to identify autism subtypes using 23 different demographic, social subtype, endocrine, eye-tracking and clinical symptom measures taken before treatment and this revealed an optimum of two different subtypes. We then assessed the proportion of identified responders to oxytocin and found that while 61.5% of one subtype included responders only 13.3% of the other did so. During the placebo phase there was no difference between the two subtypes for the small proportion of responders (19.2% vs 6.7%). This oxytocin-sensitive subtype also showed overall significant post-treatment clinical and eye-tracking measure changes. The oxytocin-sensitive subtype was primarily characterized at baseline by lower initial clinical severity (ADOS-2) and greater interest in the eye-region of emotional faces. These features alone were nearly as efficient in identifying the two subtypes as all 23 baseline measures and this easy-to-conduct approach may help rapidly and objectively screen for oxytocin responders. Future clinical trials using oxytocin interventions may therefore achieve greater success by focusing on children with this specific autism subtype and help develop individualized oxytocin intervention.