Abstract
Previous surveys revealed the majority of certified behavior analysts reported using applied behavior analysis (ABA) as a treatment for individuals on the autism spectrum. However, some certificants have also reported using treatments without evidence (Schreck et al. Behavioral Interventions, 31(4), 355-376, 2016; Schreck & Mazur Behavioral Interventions: Theory & Practice in Residential & Community- Based Clinical Programs, 23(3), 201-212, 2008). The field of ABA has undergone many changes in the last five years. This survey evaluated trends in the use and variables influencing the use of autism treatments over that time. Results indicated that study participants (N = 921 BCBA-Ds, BCBAs, BCaBAs, and RBTs) were significantly less likely to report current use of ABA and some unestablished treatments (e.g., DIR Floortime, sensory integration therapy) than participants in 2016 (Schreck et al. Behavioral Interventions, 31(4), 355-376, 2016). Participants frequently cited persuasion by others as an influence for their treatment selections. Because behavior analysts' use of unestablished treatments may be detrimental to client outcomes and the reputation and success of the field of ABA, future research is needed to identify methods for increasing behavior analysts' use of empirically supported treatments.