Comparing Flow Cytometry QBeads PlexScreen Assays with Other Immunoassays for Determining Multiple Analytes

将流式细胞术 QBeads PlexScreen 检测与其他免疫检测方法进行比较,以确定多种分析物

阅读:5
作者:Mei Ding, Anders Cavallin, Nils-Olov Hermansson, Pia Berntsson, Lisa Jinton, Sandra Rodrigo Blomqvist

Abstract

Immunoassays, utilizing the affinity of antibodies to their antigens, are powerful techniques and have been widely used for quantifying analytes, such as cytokines, in biological samples in the clinic and in drug discovery. Various immunoassays have been developed to fit for different purposes. Recently, bead-based flow cytometry assays have emerged as interesting options for multiplex quantification of analytes. In this study, we compared high-throughput flow cytometry multiplex iQue QBeads PlexScreen assays with several other commonly used immunoassays, including MSD, Luminex, ELISA, HTRF, and AlphaLISA assays. Head-to-head comparisons of quantification data of the following cytokines were made: (1) IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-13, IL-17A, IFNγ, KC/GRO, RANTES, and TNFα in mouse bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples; (2) IL-10 and TNFα in supernatants from a THP-1 cell assay; (3) IL-6, IL-10, IL-12p70, and TNFα in supernatants from a human monocyte-derived dendritic cell assay; and (4) IL-2 in supernatants from a human CD4+ cell assay. The results demonstrated a good assay correlation between the iQue and the compared assays for the cytokine studied. Although overall good assay correlations were observed, our results showed that the iQue assay generated different absolute cytokine values for some cytokines in the same sample sets compared with other assays.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。