Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the dosimetric accuracy of EBT3 film calibrated with a 6 MV beam for high dose rate brachytherapy and propose a novel method for direct film calibration with an Ir-192 source. METHODS: The 6 MV calibration was performed in water on a linear accelerator (linac). The Ir-192 calibration was accomplished by irradiating the film wrapped around a cylinder applicator with an Ir-192 source. All films were scanned 1-day post-irradiation to acquire calibration curves for all three (red, blue, and green) channels. The Ir-192 calibration films were also used for single-dose comparison. Moreover, an independent test film under a H.A.M. applicator was irradiated and the 2D dose distribution was obtained separately for each calibration using the red channel data. Gamma analysis and point-by-point profile comparison were performed to evaluate the performance of both calibrations. The uncertainty budget for each calibration system was analyzed. RESULTS: The red channel had the best performance for both calibration systems in the single-dose comparison. We found a significant 4.89% difference from the reference for doses <250 cGy using the 6 MV calibration, while the difference was only 0.87% for doses >600 cGy. Gamma analysis of the 2D dose distribution showed the Ir-192 calibration had a higher passing rate of 91.9% for the 1 mm/2% criterion, compared to 83.5% for the 6 MV calibration. Most failing points were in the low-dose region (<200 cGy). The point-by-point profile comparison reported a discrepancy of 2%-3.6% between the Ir-192 and 6 MV calibrations in this low-dose region. The linac- and Ir-192-based dosimetry systems had an uncertainty of 4.1% (k = 2) and 5.66% (k = 2), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Direct calibration of EBT3 films with an Ir-192 source is feasible and reliable, while the dosimetric accuracy of 6 MV calibration depends on the dose range. The Ir-192 calibration should be used when the measurement dose range is below 250 cGy.