Sensitivity of contributing factors to heterogeneity corrections in dosimetry of ocular brachytherapy using iodine-125 COMS plaques

碘-125 COMS 斑块眼部近距离放射治疗剂量测定中异质性校正的影响因素敏感性

阅读:1

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate sensitivity of contributing factors to heterogeneity corrections in ocular brachytherapy using iodine-125 ((125)I) Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) plaques. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Using egs_brachy, Monte Carlo (MC) simulations were performed for (125)I COMS plaques (model: IsoAid IAI-125A). Homogeneous dose (D(HOMO)) was estimated under the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group-43 assumptions, with 85 Gy prescribed to a 5 mm depth. Heterogeneous doses (D(HETERO#1-#7)) were determined with medium-heterogeneity for the following scenarios: #1. Modulay backing (M) alone, #2. Silastic insert (S) alone, #3. Interseed attenuation effects (I) alone, #4. M + S, #5. M + I, #6. S + I, and #7. M + S + I. For scenarios #1-#7, heterogeneity correction factors (HCFs) were derived from D(HETERO#1-#7)/D(HOMO) for central axis points up to 22 mm, and for off-axis points (i.e., optic disc, macula, and lens) as a function of distance from tumor to optic disc (DT) or macula (MT), and tumor dimensions in the direction of optic disc (BD) or macula (BM). RESULTS: For a 16-mm diameter COMS plaque, in central axis, the dominant factor to heterogeneity corrections (dose reduction by 9.5-13.8% with heterogeneity) was Silastic insert at a depth ≤ 5 mm, whereas both Modulay backing and Silastic insert were contributing (range, 12.2-19.0%) at deeper depths. For off-axis, Silastic insert was the major factor to heterogeneity corrections (≥ 11.8%) at DT (MT) ≤ 6.9 (7.6) mm for optic disc (macula) and (range, 8.9-10.0%) at MT > 18.5 mm for lens, but both Modulay backing and Silastic insert were contributing (range, 18.3-24.4%) at farther DT (MT) for optic disc (macula) and (range, 12.8-18.2%) at MT ≤ 18.5 mm for lens. Interseed effects were small (≤ 1.7% for central axis and ≤ 2.3% for off-axis). Data for the other six plaques (10-14 mm and 18-22 mm diameter) presented similar trends. CONCLUSIONS: The use of universal HCF(s) for the two dominant factors determined in this study will facilitate heterogeneous dose estimates for each clinical scenario without an MC tool.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。