Conclusions
Fryer and colleagues explored the airway and cellular responses in guinea pigs exposed to ozone. The HEI Review Committee, which conducted an independent review of the study, agreed that the findings supported the authors’ hypothesis (1) that exposure to ozone stimulates production of eosinophils in bone marrow, (2) that these newly formed eosinophils migrate to the lungs, and (3) that those eosinophils play a delayed but potentially beneficial role in reducing ozone-induced inflammation in the airways of healthy normal animals, but not in allergen-sensitized animals. The Committee also agreed that guinea pigs were a good model for studying responses to an allergen, because a major subtype of asthma (the high Th2 or allergic type) is associated with high levels of eosinophils in the blood. A novel finding was that the TNFa blocker etanercept decreased ozone-induced formation of eosinophils in the bone marrow and blocked eosinophil migration to the lung in normal animals. However, because injecting etanercept had little effect on eosinophils and did not decrease bronchoconstriction in allergic guinea pigs, the potential for treating patients with allergic asthma with TNFa blockers is uncertain. This is consistent with the poor performance of TNFa blockers in clinical studies of asthma treatment. Blocking the cytokine IL-5 with an anti-IL-5 antibody substantially decreased bronchoconstriction in sensitized animals. This suggests that therapies targeting IL-5 and eosinophils would be promising in at least some types of asthma. The Committee expressed caution toward experiments with cytokine blockers, both in animal models and humans, because such blockers are often not specific to a particular cell type and may differ at different sites in the body. Without further detailed confirmation of the effects of the blockers, interpreting these experiments can be challenging. The Committee concluded that the study by Fryer and colleagues raises several intriguing directions for future research, including exploring ways in which newly formed eosinophils differ from pre-existing ones, and how such findings apply to humans with allergy or asthma.
Results
1. Allergic and normal animals differed in the time course of bronchoconstriction and changes in cell types after ozone exposure. In normal animals, bronchoconstriction increased substantially at day 1 but decreased by day 3 after ozone exposure. In contrast, in allergic animals bronchoconstriction remained high at day 3. Ozone also increased the percentage of newly formed, BrdU2 positive eosinophils in the bone marrow and lungs of normal but not allergic animals. 2. Pretreatment with the TNFa blocker etanercept had complex effects, which differed between normal and allergic animals. In normal animals, etanercept decreased ozone-induced new synthesis of eosinophils in the bone marrow and blocked eosinophil migration to the lung; it also increased bronchoconstriction at day 3 (relative to day 1 without etanercept). In allergic animals, etanercept had no effect on any cell type in the bone marrow or lung after exposure to ozone and did not change bronchoconstriction compared with allergic animals not treated with etanercept. Etanercept tended to increase the numbers of blood monocytes and lymphocytes in air- and ozone-exposed normal and allergic animals at day 3, but had no effect on eosinophils in blood at this time point. This was one of the few statistically significant findings in the blood of exposed animals in the study. 3. Anti-IL-5 reduced bronchoconstriction at day 3 after exposure of allergic animals to ozone. In contrast, bronchoconstriction was greatly increased in normal animals treated with anti-IL-5. Conclusions: Fryer and colleagues explored the airway and cellular responses in guinea pigs exposed to ozone. The HEI Review Committee, which conducted an independent review of the study, agreed that the findings supported the authors’ hypothesis (1) that exposure to ozone stimulates production of eosinophils in bone marrow, (2) that these newly formed eosinophils migrate to the lungs, and (3) that those eosinophils play a delayed but potentially beneficial role in reducing ozone-induced inflammation in the airways of healthy normal animals, but not in allergen-sensitized animals. The Committee also agreed that guinea pigs were a good model for studying responses to an allergen, because a major subtype of asthma (the high Th2 or allergic type) is associated with high levels of eosinophils in the blood. A novel finding was that the TNFa blocker etanercept decreased ozone-induced formation of eosinophils in the bone marrow and blocked eosinophil migration to the lung in normal animals. However, because injecting etanercept had little effect on eosinophils and did not decrease bronchoconstriction in allergic guinea pigs, the potential for treating patients with allergic asthma with TNFa blockers is uncertain. This is consistent with the poor performance of TNFa blockers in clinical studies of asthma treatment. Blocking the cytokine IL-5 with an anti-IL-5 antibody substantially decreased bronchoconstriction in sensitized animals. This suggests that therapies targeting IL-5 and eosinophils would be promising in at least some types of asthma. The Committee expressed caution toward experiments with cytokine blockers, both in animal models and humans, because such blockers are often not specific to a particular cell type and may differ at different sites in the body. Without further detailed confirmation of the effects of the blockers, interpreting these experiments can be challenging. The Committee concluded that the study by Fryer and colleagues raises several intriguing directions for future research, including exploring ways in which newly formed eosinophils differ from pre-existing ones, and how such findings apply to humans with allergy or asthma.