A combination of portal vein stent insertion and endovascular iodine-125 seed-strip implantation, followed by transcatheter arterial chemoembolization with sorafenib for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma-associated portal vein tumor thrombus

采用门静脉支架置入联合血管内碘-125粒子条植入术,随后进行索拉非尼经导管动脉化疗栓塞术治疗肝细胞癌相关门静脉癌栓

阅读:1

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess efficacy of portal vein stent (PVS) insertion and endovascular iodine-125 ((125)I) seed-strip implantation, followed by transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) with sorafenib (PVS-(125)I TACE-S) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)-associated type II or type III portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on 53 consecutive patients with HCC and type II or type III PVTT, from May 2014 to July 2018. Patients were divided into 2 groups, including group A with 28 patients treated with PVS-(125)I TACE-S, and group B with 25 patients treated with TACE-S. Primary end-point was overall survival (OS), while secondary endpoints were hepatic function and disease control rate (DCR). Albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score approach was used for evaluating liver function. Cox regression analysis was applied to identify factors associated with treatment outcomes. RESULTS: No pre-operative differences were found in ALBI scores between group A and group B (-2.57 ±0.42 vs. -2.61 ±0.38, p = 0.724), or in these scores at 1 month post-operatively (-2.62 ±0.46 vs. -2.20 ±0.59, p = 0.666). However, these scores were significantly different at 3 (-2.17 ±0.59 vs. -1.69 ±0.48, p = 0.007) and 6 (-2.28 ±1.23 vs. -1.47 ±0.31, p = 0.044) months post-operatively. In addition, group A exhibited higher DCR (71.4% vs. 44.0%, p = 0.043) after 6 months of treatment and extended OS duration (11.4 vs. 7.7 months, p = 0.007). A stratified analysis revealed that OS in patients with type II PVTT did not differ significantly (10.4 vs. 10.7 months, p = 0.689), but OS with type III varied significantly (11.5 vs. 7.5 months, p = 0.002). Multivariate analysis revealed that tumor size > 10 cm (p = 0.002) and multiple tumors (p = 0.022) were independent predictors for poor prognosis, whereas PVS-(125)I TACE-S was predictor for favorable patient's prognosis (p = 0.040). CONCLUSIONS: PVS-(125)I TACE-S represents a potentially viable strategy for improving hepatic functionality, DCR, and OS in HCC with type III PVTT compared with TACE-S alone.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。