Conclusions
Delayed sample processing causes considerable immunohenotypic alterations, which can lead to false interpretation of the results. If delayed sample evaluation is unavoidable, markers that remain more stable over time should be considered with more weight in the diagnosis of MDS.
Material and methods
Bone marrow samples were labelled and analysed immediately after aspiration and on two consecutive days. The effect of anticoagulant type was evaluated in 16 bone marrow samples. Thirty-seven different immunophenotypic variables were recorded after eight-colour staining. Furthermore, 8 normal peripheral blood samples collected in K3-EDTA and Na-heparin were examined with different clones of CD11b antibodies and four parameters were recorded with both anticoagulants on two consecutive days.
Methods
Bone marrow samples were labelled and analysed immediately after aspiration and on two consecutive days. The effect of anticoagulant type was evaluated in 16 bone marrow samples. Thirty-seven different immunophenotypic variables were recorded after eight-colour staining. Furthermore, 8 normal peripheral blood samples collected in K3-EDTA and Na-heparin were examined with different clones of CD11b antibodies and four parameters were recorded with both anticoagulants on two consecutive days.
Results
Fourteen significant differences were detected in the initial immunophenotype of fresh samples collected in K3-EDTA and Na-heparin. Regardless of the anticoagulant type, eleven parameters remained stable despite delayed sample handling. Due to delayed sample processing, more alterations were detected in the samples collected in K3-EDTA than in the samples collected in Na-heparin. The type of CD11b clone influenced the reduction of fluorescence intensity only in samples collected in K3-EDTA, where the alterations were contrary to the changes observed in Na-heparin. Conclusions: Delayed sample processing causes considerable immunohenotypic alterations, which can lead to false interpretation of the results. If delayed sample evaluation is unavoidable, markers that remain more stable over time should be considered with more weight in the diagnosis of MDS.