Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that non-fasting lipids have similar values in cardiovascular risk estimation as fasting, but it is not clear whether this could also be applicable to Chinese participants. METHODS: A total of 127 (76 men, 51 women) participants without atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD) were enrolled in the study. Serum levels of blood lipids were monitored at 0 h, 2 h and 4 h after a daily breakfast. Ten-year cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk was estimated with China ASCVD risk estimator and European SCORE risk charts. Kappa statistic was used to determine agreement among estimators. RESULTS: China ASCVD risk estimator assessed half of the participants as low risk, while European risk charts assessed half of the participants as moderate risk in the same participants. Reliability analysis in China ASCVD risk estimator and Europe SCORE risk charts based on fasting and or non-fasting lipids profile were relatively high (Kappa =0.731 or 0.718, P<0.001), (Kappa =0.922 or 0.935, P<0.001) (Kappa =0.886 or 0.874, P<0.001), but agreement between two were relatively poor in both fasting and non-fasting states (Kappa =0.339 or 0.300, P<0.001), (Kappa =0.364 or 0.286, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Promoting use of non-fasting lipids in diagnosis, evaluation, and prediction of CVD are feasible. Furthermore, non-fasting lipids could be used in China ASCVD risk estimator to evaluate 10-year risk of ASCVD among Chinese general participants.