Automated versus manual in vivo segmentation of carotid plaque MRI

颈动脉斑块磁共振成像体内分割的自动与手动方法比较

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Automatically identifying carotid plaque composition using MR imaging remains a challenging task in vivo. The purpose of our study was to compare the detection and quantification of carotid artery atherosclerotic plaque components based on in vivo MR imaging data using manual and automated segmentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty patients from a multicenter study were split into a training group (20 patients) and a study group (40 patients). Each MR imaging study consisted of 4 high-resolution carotid wall sequences (T1, T2, PDw, TOF). Manual segmentation was performed by delineation of the vessel wall and different plaque components. Automated segmentation was performed in the study group by a supervised classifier trained on images from the training group of patients. RESULTS: For the detection of plaque components, the agreement between the visual and automated analysis was moderate for calcifications (κ = 0.59, CI 95% [0.36-0.82]) and good for hemorrhage (0.65 [0.42-0.88]) and lipids (0.65 [0.03-1.27]). For quantification of plaque volumes, the intraclass correlation was high for hemorrhage (0.80 [0.54-0.92]) and fibrous tissue (0.80 [0.65-0.89]), good for lipids (0.65 [0.43-0.80]), and poor for calcifications. CONCLUSIONS: In 40 patients with carotid stenosis, our results indicated that it was possible to automatically detect carotid plaque components with substantial or good agreement with visual identification, and that the volumes obtained manually and automatically were reasonably consistent for hemorrhage and lipids but not for calcium.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。