Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Improving the quality of sleep may promote enhanced recovery in surgical patients. In addition to controversial or conflicting study conclusions, the current clinical studies on pharmacotherapy for improving postoperative sleep quality are mostly limited to evaluating the effect of a specific drug or supplement compared with placebo, and they lack comparisons between drugs or supplements. Therefore, we plan to conduct a systematic review and network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of different drugs or supplements for improving postoperative sleep quality. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CNKI and Wanfang databases from the dates of their inception to December 2022. We will only include randomised controlled trials, irrespective of language and publication status. The primary outcome is postoperative sleep quality assessed by any validated tools or polysomnography. We will assess the quality of all included trials according to version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials. We will use the GeMTC package of R software to perform direct and indirect comparisons via a Bayesian framework using a random-effects model. We will use the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis approach to evaluate the quality of evidence. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required for this protocol because we will only be pooling published data. We plan to submit our review to academic conferences and peer-reviewed academic journals. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022356508.