Abstract
Perovskite solar cell (PSC) technology has achieved remarkable progress, with champion power conversion efficiencies (PCE) exceeding 26%. However, the long-term stability of PSCs remains a significant barrier to their widespread commercialization. Carbon-based PSCs (C-PSCs) have gained attention as a promising cost-effective and scalable production solution, replacing expensive metal electrodes and offering improved stability. Despite these advantages, C-PSCs face challenges in matching the performance of noble metal-based PSCs, particularly in terms of carrier extraction efficiency and reduced carrier recombination at the carbon/perovskite interface. The selection of hole transport materials (HTMs) is crucial for optimizing this interface, but comprehensive studies on HTM selection for C-PSCs are limited. This study systematically investigated three commonly used hole transport layers (HTLs): Spiro-OMeTAD, CuSCN, and PTAA. Our results show that Spiro-OMeTAD-based C-PSCs exhibit the best overall performance, achieving a PCE of 19.29%. CuSCN-based devices, while lower in efficiency (11.94% PCE), demonstrated superior stability, retaining approximately 60% of their initial performance after 500 hours under ambient conditions. PTAA-based devices achieved a PCE of 12.92% but exhibited significant degradation, maintaining only ∼35% of their original efficiency over the same duration. These findings highlight the importance of selecting HTLs that balance performance and stability and emphasize the need for further optimization to enhance the commercial viability of C-PSCs.