Heart rate manipulation in dilated cardiomyopathy: Assessing the role of Ivabradine

扩张型心肌病的心率控制:评估伊伐布雷定的作用

阅读:8
作者:Deep Chandh Raja, Aditya Kapoor, Archana Sinha, Shiridhar Kashyap, Roopali Khanna, Sudeep Kumar, Naveen Garg, Satyendra Tewari, Pravin Goel

Background

Heart rate (HR) reduction is of benefit in chronic heart failure (HF). The effect of heart rate reduction using Ivabradine on various echocardiographic parameters in dilated cardiomyopathy has been less investigated.

Conclusion

Addition of Ivabradine to standard therapy in patients with DCM and symptomatic HF and targeting a heart rate<70/min improves symptoms, quality of life and various echocardiographic parameters.

Methods

Of 187 patients with HF (DCM, NYHA II-IV, baseline HR>70/min), 125 patients were randomized to standard therapy (beta blockers, ACEI, diuretics, n=62) or add-on Ivabradine (titrated to maximum 7.5mg BD, n=63). Beta-blockers were titrated in both the groups.

Results

At 3 months both groups had improvement in NYHA class, 6min walk test, Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLWHF) scores and fall in BNP, however the magnitude of change was greater in Ivabradine group. Those on Ivabradine also had lower LV volumes, higher LVEF (28.8±3.6 vs 27.2±0.5, p=0.01) and more favorable LV global strain (11±1.7vs 12.2±1.1, p=<0.001), MPI (0.72±0.1 vs 0.6±0.1, p=<0.001), LV mass (115.2±30 vs 131.4±35, p=0.007), LV wall stress (219.8±46 vs 238±54) and calculated LV work (366±101 vs 401±102, p=0.05). The benefit of Ivabradine was sustained at 6 months follow up. The % change in HR was significantly higher in Ivabradine group (-32.2% vs -19.3%, p=0.001) with no difference in blood pressure. Resting HR<70/min was achieved in 96.8% vs 27.9%, respectively in the two groups.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。