Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fingertip amputations are common injuries presenting to the emergency room. However, all amputations do not have a chance of replantation, and composite graft is among the salvage treatments in this case. This treatment is both easy to apply and economical. Our study compares the success and cost of composite grafting in the emergency and operating rooms. METHODS: Thirty-six patients who met the criteria were included in the study. The decision on the repair site was made by the sur-geon according to patient compliance and the intensity of the emergency clinic. Demographic and disease information of the patients were recorded. P<0.05 was accepted as the significance level. RESULTS: Twenty-two cases were pediatric patients. Eighteen cases of crush injuries and 22 cases were treated in the emergency room. There was no significant difference in terms of complications, need for additional intervention, and short fingers related to interventions performed in the emergency room and operating room. Interventions in the emergency department were significantly lower in cost and shorter hospitalization times. There was no significant difference in terms of patient satisfaction. CONCLUSION: Composite grafting is a simple and reliable method in fingertip injuries and gives satisfactory results in terms of patient satisfaction. In addition, composite graft application in fingertip injuries in the emergency department will both reduce the cost and prevent hospital infections that may occur due to the reduction in hospitalization.