Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cancer growth is significantly influenced by processes such as pyroptosis, apoptosis, and necroptosis that underlie PANoptosis, a proinflammatory programmed cell death. Several studies have examined the long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) associated with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAAD). However, the predictive value of lncRNAs related to PANoptosis for PAAD has not been established. METHODS: The Clinical Genome Atlas database was used to obtain the transcriptome 、clinical data and the corresponding mutation data of the patients with PAAD in this study. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression analysis was employed to obtain prognosis-related lncRNAs for constructing a risk signature. According to the median risk score of the signature, patients with PAAD were grouped into low- and high-risk groups to further compare the survival prognosis of different risk groups. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves, c-index analysis, nomograms, principal component analysis and univariate Cox and multivariate Cox regression were performed for the internal validation of the signature. In addition, enrichment analysis of different genes was performed using gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis. Lastly, differences in tumor mutation burden (TMB), immune function, tumor immune dysfunction and rejection (TIDE), and drug response were determined for the two risk groups. RESULTS: The signature was constructed with six PANoptosis-related lncRNAs (AC067817.2、LINC02004、AC243829.1、AC092171.5、AP005233.2、AC004687.1) that predicted the prognosis of the patients with PAAD. Survival curves showed that patients in the two risk groups had statistically significant differences in prognosis (P < 0.05), and multi-cox regression analysis identified risk score as an independent risk factor for PAAD prognosis, and internal validation of nomograms showed high confidence in the signature. GO and KEGG enrichment analysis showed functional and pathway differences between the high- and low-risk groups. TMB evaluation demonstrated that patients in the high-risk group had a higher frequency of mutations. The TIDE score indicated that the high-risk group had a lower risk of immunotherapy escape and better immunotherapy outcomes. Additionally, the two risk groups revealed significantly different responses to 11 anticancer drugs. CONCLUSION: We identified a novel risk signature for PANoptosis-related lncRNAs, which is a standalone prognostic indicator for PAAD. The PANoptosis-related lncRNA risk signature may be relevant for immunotherapy and a therapeutic target for PAAD.