Early enteral nutrition combined with supplemental parenteral nutrition vs. total parenteral nutrition after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective and propensity score-matched analysis of postoperative complications

胰十二指肠切除术后早期肠内营养联合补充肠外营养与全肠外营养:一项回顾性倾向评分匹配分析术后并发症

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postoperative nutritional support strategy after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) remains controversial. This retrospective study aims to evaluate early enteral nutrition (EEN) combined with supplemental parenteral nutrition (SPN) vs. parenteral nutrition (PN) as postoperative nutritional support, focusing on early clinical outcomes and postoperative complications in patients who underwent PD. METHODS: Clinical data from consecutive patients who underwent PD between January 2022 and July 2024 were collected and analyzed in this retrospective study. The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative complications. The secondary outcomes included specific postoperative complications, such as delayed gastric emptying (DGE), bile leak (BL), chyle leak (CL), acute pancreatitis (AP), postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH), and infectious complications, compared between the two groups. A propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis was performed to balance baseline confounders between the groups. RESULTS: According to perioperative nutritional protocols, 248 patients were included and divided into the EEN + SPN group (n = 116) and the PN group (n = 132). After PSM, baseline characteristics were balanced between the EEN + SPN group (n = 59) and the PN group (n = 59). No statistically significant differences were observed in the incidence of complications between the two groups, either before or after PSM (all p > 0.05). Before PSM, the overall incidence of severe postoperative complications was 10.1%. The EEN + SPN group demonstrated a significantly lower incidence of severe complications compared to the PN group both before and after PSM (p < 0.05). Analysis of secondary outcomes (which included a comparative analysis of detailed complications) revealed no significant differences between the groups. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this study demonstrates that for patients at nutritional risk following PD, EEN + SPN is a safe and feasible nutritional support strategy and is associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of severe complications.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。