Abstract
Nanocomposites of complex metal hydrides and oxides are promising solid state electrolytes. The interaction of the metal hydride with the oxide results in a highly conducting interface layer. Up until now it has been assumed that the interface chemistry is independent of the nanoconfinement method. Using (29)Si solid state NMR and LiBH(4)/SiO(2) as a model system, we show that the silica surface chemistry differs for nanocomposites prepared via melt infiltration or ball milling. After melt infiltration, a Si···H···BH(3) complex is present on the interface, together with silanol and siloxane groups. However, after ball milling, the silica surface consists of Si- H sites, and silanol and siloxane groups. We propose that this change is related to a redistribution of silanol groups on the silica surface during ball milling, where free silanol groups are converted to mutually hydrogen-bonded silanol groups. The results presented here help to explain the difference in ionic conductivity between nanocomposites prepared via ball milling and melt infiltration.