Abstract
Anecdotally, clinicians have reported an increase in demand for permanent contraception procedures since the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (Dobbs) decision, which may reflect patients’ fear of losing reproductive autonomy. In this commentary we rely upon the history of bias and discrimination in permanent contraception access in the United States to interpret and predict potential outcomes following the Dobbs decision. These findings can shape clinical practice as clinicians aim to balance meeting a patient’s contraceptive goals while upholding a commitment to avoid reproductive coercion. We provide recommendations for clinicians’ contraceptive counseling to ensure equitable access to permanent contraception for all patients.