Agreement between carotid and LVOT non-invasive cardiac output measurements in ED septic shock patients: a prospective observational study

急诊脓毒性休克患者颈动脉和左心室流出道无创心输出量测量结果的一致性:一项前瞻性观察研究

阅读:1

Abstract

Sepsis significantly impacts the circulatory system and is associated with high mortality rates, particularly in patients with septic shock who require urgent treatment. Non-invasive cardiac output monitoring is a critical bedside tool for assessing fluid responsiveness. This study aimed to evaluate the agreement between cardiac output measurements obtained from the carotid artery and the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) in patients with septic shock in the emergency department (ED). A prospective observational study was conducted on adult patients diagnosed with septic shock and admitted to the ED between October 2023 and October 2024. Cardiac output was calculated using the standard formula (CO = VTI × cross-sectional area × heart rate) for both LVOT and carotid measurements. Agreement between LVOT-derived and carotid-derived cardiac output was assessed using Lin's concordance correlation coefficient, intraclass correlation coefficient, Bland-Altman analysis, and percentage error. Forty patients with septic shock were included in the study. The mean carotid blood flow was 0.855 L/min, while the mean cardiac output measured by LVOT echocardiography was 5.329 L/min. Cardiac output measurements derived from carotid artery VTI and LVOT VTI showed a moderate agreement, as demonstrated by Lin's Concordance Correlation Coefficient of 0.527 (p < 0.001) and an Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (absolute agreement) of 0.695 (p < 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis revealed a bias of - 0.47 (95% CI: -2.11 to 1.17), with a concordance interval ranging from - 10.51 (95% CI: -13.35 to - 7.67) to 9.58 (95% CI: 6.74 to 12.42). Non-invasive cardiac output measurements from the carotid artery exhibited only moderate agreement with those derived from the LVOT, accompanied by wide limits of agreement. This indicates that the two methods should not be utilized interchangeably for clinical decision-making in individual patients. Carotid artery measurements should not be regarded as a direct replacement for LVOT examinations.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。