Comparison of Intermittent versus Continuous Superior Venal Caval Oxygen Saturation Monitoring in Early Goal Directed Therapy in Septic Shock: A Systematic Review

脓毒性休克早期目标导向治疗中间歇性与持续性上腔静脉氧饱和度监测的比较:系统评价

阅读:1

Abstract

Early goal directed therapy (EGDT) is a bundle of care (monitoring ScvO (2) and lactate along with clinical parameters and instituting therapy) that has shown to improve outcomes in patients with septic shock. We conducted a systematic review of clinical trials and observational studies to compare intermittent versus continuous monitoring of ScvO (2) . We did major database searches till August 2020. Hospitalized children (>2 months age) and adults with septic shock were included. The intervention was "intermittent ScvO (2) monitoring," and the comparator was "continuous ScvO (2) monitoring." The primary outcome is "all-cause mortality." Of 564 citations, 3 studies ( n  = 541) including both children and adults were included in the analysis. There was no significant difference in the "overall/all-cause mortality" (two randomized controlled trials; 258 participants) between the "intermittent" and "continuous" ScvO (2) monitoring groups (relative risk [RR]: 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.8-1.24). However, a single observational study (283 participants) showed a significant increase in mortality in the intermittent group (RR: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.03-2.05). The GRADE evidence generated for "overall/all-cause mortality" was of "moderate certainty." To conclude, the present meta-analysis did not find any significant difference between "intermittent" and "continuous" ScvO (2) monitoring in patients with septic shock.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。