Assessing bleeding risk by thromboelastography when automated platelet count fails due to giant platelets

当由于巨型血小板导致自动血小板计数失败时,可通过血栓弹力图评估出血风险。

阅读:1

Abstract

Giant platelets with thrombocytopenia are observed in various conditions, including rare macrothrombocytopenias with high bleeding tendency. An automated hematology analyzer may fail to provide valid platelet count if numerous giant platelets are present, affecting transfusion management. To determine the nature of giant platelets and test whether thromboelastography (TEG) may help assess bleeding risk in critically ill patients with an invalid automated platelet count. A DXI 900 hematology analyzer and TEG 5000 were used for complete blood count (CBC) and TEG, respectively. Immunofluorescent staining of the peripheral blood smear with anti-β3 immunoglobulin G was performed to visualize these giant platelets, which were quantified using an automatic software. In the past 6 months, we have performed over 150 000 CBC tests and identified only 5 patients with a high number of giant platelets, which invalidated automatic platelet counts. The age of these patients varied from 21 to 76 years, and all were critically ill. In 3 out of 5 patients with thrombocytopenia but normal TEG parameters, no platetelet transfusion was given. Immunofluorescent microscopy demonstrated that most of these giant platelets were in fact megakaryocytes. In conclusion, our results indicate that most circulating giant platelets are megakaryocytes that are potentially functional in supporting hemostasis based on TEG analysis. Therefore, TEG may be used to quickly assess the bleeding risk and help guide appropriate transfusion management in thrombocytopenic patients with circulating giant platelets/megakaryocytes.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。