Abstract
BACKGROUND: Currently, the Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score (NFS) are used to predict fibrosis and steatosis in patients with or at risk for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). More recently, the fibrotic nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) index (FNI) and steatosis-associated fibrosis estimator (SAFE) have been created. We have compared the accuracy of these noninvasive scoring systems in MASLD patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of 244 biopsy-proven MASLD patients from a tertiary health care system. Score performances were determined by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve with 95% confidence intervals, sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV). RESULTS: About 25 (10.3%) patients had fibrotic metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). The FNI score was best at predicting fibrotic MASH with an AUROC of 0.78, while NFS was the worst at predicting fibrotic NASH with an AUROC of 0.60. In the entire cohort, FNI of 0.33, FIB-4 of 2.67, SAFE >100, and NFS >0.675 had PPVs of 17%, 31%, 17%, and 16%, respectively, and NPVs of 97%, 92%, 96%, and 91%, respectively. Specificity was greatest for FIB4 at 92% and NFS at 86%, whereas the sensitivity was greatest for FNI and SAFE scores at 88% and 80%, respectively. CONCLUSION: FNI and SAFE scores have superior diagnostic accuracy for fibrotic MASH compared to other scoring systems. While liver biopsy remains the gold standard diagnostic method, noninvasive scores like FNI, and SAFE scores can be used in everyday clinical practice to assess for fibrotic MASH.