Differences in the effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and median nerve electrical stimulation in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness after intracerebral hemorrhage: a randomized controlled trial protocol

重复经颅磁刺激和正中神经电刺激对脑出血后意识障碍持续存在患者疗效的差异:一项随机对照试验方案

阅读:2

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and median nerve electrical stimulation (MNES) are two non-invasive neuromodulation techniques that have demonstrated potential in facilitating the recovery of consciousness in patients with impaired consciousness. However, existing studies on awakening interventions for patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness (pDoC) following intracerebral hemorrhage remains limited. In particular, systematic comparisons of the efficacy of rTMS versus MNES in this specific patient population are lacking. METHODS: This is a single-center randomized controlled trial in which 45 patients will be randomly assigned to the control group, rTMS group and MNES group. The intervention period will lasts 4 weeks. All patients underwent multimodal assessments before and at the end of treatment, which were used to comprehensively evaluate their recovery of consciousness and changes in brain function. The assessments includes the Coma Recovery Scale, electroencephalogram, event-related potentials (P300 and mismatched negative) and functional near-infrared spectroscopy. DISCUSSION: This study represents the first systematic comparison of the efficacy between rTMS and MNES in patients with pDoC following intracerebral hemorrhage. The objective is to employ multimodal assessment techniques to provide clinical references into the individualized application of these neuromodulation therapies. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://www.chictr.org.cn/, identifier ChiCTR2400082022.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。