Abstract
BACKGROUND: Plaque psoriasis (PsO) requires long-term treatment for symptom control and remission; thus, a long-term pharmacological intervention is necessary. Treatment persistence reflects long-term therapeutic effectiveness and tolerance. OBJECTIVES: This study investigates drug persistence and compares treatment discontinuation rates across biologic agents and apremilast used by PsO patients in Finland and Sweden. METHODS: This retrospective register-based cohort study included bio-naïve patients (≥18 years) with moderate-to-severe PsO, who initiated treatment with abatacept, adalimumab, brodalumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, guselkumab, ixekizumab, risankizumab, secukinumab, tildrakizumab, ustekinumab or apremilast during 2008-2020 in Finland or Sweden. The main analysis evaluated persistence (based on duration of continuous treatment) and compared rates of treatment discontinuation using guselkumab as reference drug, during 2018-2020 in Finland. Treatment discontinuation was assessed by survival analysis of the time to first drug discontinuation, including switching to other study drugs. Due to limited sample size (n < 20), certain biologics (abatacept, brodalumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, risankizumab and tildrakizumab) were excluded from the persistence analysis. RESULTS: In Finland, 709 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria during 2018-2020 for the main analysis. The highest persistence was observed for guselkumab and ustekinumab with 90 and 85% of treated patients, respectively, continuing treatment for ≥1 year. Comparable results were observed in the expanded cohort analysis (index starting in 2008; 2745 bio-naïve patients in Finland and 10,970 in Sweden). Furthermore, patients treated with guselkumab in Finland showed lower treatment discontinuation rates compared to other study drugs. CONCLUSION: Guselkumab and ustekinumab demonstrated high persistence as measured by continued treatment for at least 1 year. Furthermore, these treatments demonstrated lower rates of discontinuation compared to other study drugs included in the analysis. Understanding the balance between efficacy and feasibility in treatment decisions is crucial, as feasibility may impact persistency outcomes and potentially increase persistency rates.