Abstract
Due to their high specificity, peptides are promising candidates in drug development, but fast degradation often limits their biological activity. Thus, a short half-life is one of the major challenges in the development of new peptide therapeutics. Moreover, the enzymatic cleavage of peptides can be a reason for misleading results in biological assays. Peptide stability assays typically consist of incubation, precipitation, and detection steps. However, the current methods differ greatly regarding these three steps, thus limiting the compatibility. Here, we systematically evaluate different parameters of peptide stability assays. First, we quantified and compared the analyte loss during the precipitation of plasma proteins. Especially, broadly used precipitation by strong acids was found to be unsuitable, while mixtures of organic solvents preserved more peptides for further analysis. Next, the stability of four fluorescently labeled model peptides was analyzed in blood plasma and two different cell culture supernatants. Strong variation in the degradation dynamics and patterns was found. Finally, we evaluated the role of fluorescent labeling on peptide stability and compared results to peptides with isotopic labels, underlining the individual advantages of both methods. Altogether, the data provide important parameters for analyzing and comparing the peptide stability.