Comparative Analysis of Serum Magnesium Ion Levels Using Three Measurement Methods: Spectrophotometry, Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry, and Inductively Coupled Plasma With Optical Emission Spectrophotometry

采用三种测量方法(分光光度法、原子吸收分光光度法和电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法)对血清镁离子水平进行比较分析

阅读:1

Abstract

Magnesium is a cation that plays as an important cofactor in various enzymatic reactions. It is the fourth most abundant cation in the body after sodium, potassium, and calcium. There are various magnesium measurement methods available such as spectrophotometry, atomic absorption spectrophotometry, and inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrophotometry. These measurement methods have various advantages and disadvantages in measuring magnesium levels in serum. This study aimed to compare the magnesium measurement results by using three different methods. A total of 221 samples were examined for magnesium levels using spectrophotometry, atomic absorption spectrophotometry, and inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrophotometry methods. The results were then grouped into hypomagnesemia, noromagnesemia, and hypermagnesemia according to normal values. The mean and standard deviation were calculated and compared across three different methods. The mean and standard deviation of serum magnesium ion levels measured using spectrophotometry, atomic absorption spectrophotometry, and inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrophotometry methods were 1.84 ± 0.43, 1.86 ± 0.43, and 1.85 ± 0.43 (mg/dL), respectively. There were no significant differences (p value > 0.05) in serum magnesium levels using spectrophotometry, atomic absorption spectrophotometry, and inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrophotometry measurement methods, indicating similar reliability among the methods.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。