Abstract
Effective vertical yield stress (σ'(xy)) is essential in accurately describing fine-grained soils' mechanical properties and their behaviour under load over time. It helps assess settlements and stress history. In most constitutive models, this parameter indicates changes in the soil behaviour due to the development of recoverable and irrecoverable strains resulting from loading. The results of oedometric compression tests for 25 soil samples with a wide range of plasticity parameters were used for the investigation. The intermediate fine-grained soils comprised different proportions of clayey, silty and sandy fractions. An in-depth, two-staged statistical analysis was carried out to compare twelve methods of determining effective vertical yield stress, namely: Casagrande (CM), Pacheco Silva (PSM), Butterfield (BTM), Oikawa (OIM), Onitsuka (ONM), Boone (BM), Becker (WM), Morin (WPUVSM) Wang & Frost (DSEM), Tavenas (SEM), Senol (SLSEM), and Janbu (JM). It aimed to check the association of these methods and the consistency of the obtained results. Based on the difference analysis, the methods originated in the work approach (i.e. WM, WPUVSM, DSEM) and CM gave comparable σ'(xy) values. The methods utilised bi-logarithmic plots (i.e. BTM, OIM, ONM) received slightly greater or lesser σ'(xy) values than BM and JM. The remaining methods were characterised by medium to the high variability and were sensitive to even the slightest disturbances resulting from the procedure of determining σ'(xy).