Does laser injury induce a different neovascularisation pattern from mechanical or ischaemic injuries?

激光损伤引起的血管新生模式是否与机械损伤或缺血性损伤不同?

阅读:1

Abstract

AIM: To analyse the arteriolar pattern of laser induced channels and their surroundings compared with mechanical and ischaemic injury. METHODS: 24 pigs were randomised to a myocardial infarction group, a transmyocardial laser revascularisation group, a needle group, or a control group. In the laser revascularisation and needle groups, five channels were created either with a 1.75 mm probe holmium-YAG laser or a Tru-cut needle of the same size. Animals were killed 28 days later. Morphometric analysis of vascular density was expressed as the mean (SD) number of arteriolar structures/cm(2). RESULTS: Laser and needle channels were completely invaded by granulation tissue. Their surface areas did not differ significantly: 2.28 (0.7) mm(2) and 2.38 (1.1) mm(2), respectively (p = 0.82). Within both types of channel, arteriolar density was significantly increased in comparison with the myocardial infarction scar: 197 (52)/cm(2) and 190 (64)/cm(2), respectively (p = 0.8) versus 56 (20)/cm(2) (p < 0.001 for both comparisons). The area of 1 mm width immediately adjacent to the laser and needle channels showed a density of 25 (16)/cm(2) and 23 (18)/cm(2), respectively, which is similar to that of normal tissue (28 (10)/cm(2); p = 0.6 and p = 0.4, respectively). The mean arteriolar diameter was similar throughout all the regions analysed. CONCLUSIONS: Both laser and needle channels produce a similar increase in arteriolar structures, which is limited to the lesion itself. This suggests that laser injury is not more potent as an angiogenic stimulator than mechanical injury, which in turn is superior to infarction.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。