Abstract
PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the shaping abilities of different nickel-titanium file systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-six j-shaped resin blocks were randomly divided into three groups (n = 22): Group T-Endo MUST (TE), Group WaveOne (W), Group TruNatomy (TR). After canal preparation, the amount of material removed from the canal, the centering ratio of the file systems, the direction and amount of canal transportation, and shaping errors were evaluated. Shaping time was calculated. Data of shaping time were analyzed with ANOVA and Tamhane test. Data on the shaping ability were analyzed with two- and three-way ROBUST ANOVA. The significance level was set at p = 0.05. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference between all groups for shaping time (p < 0.001). There was a statistically significant difference between groups for the total amount of material removed (p < 0.001). The directions of canal transportation were the inner surface of the curvature for W and TR and the outer for TE. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups for the amount of transportation (p > 0.05). The centering ratio of TE and W was statistically higher than TruNatomy (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: TruNatomy removed the least material that supported the minimally invasive endodontic approach. All file systems caused similar transportation and did not change the original canal shape.