Abstract
BACKGROUND: The oxygen uptake efficiency slope (OUES) is considered a reliable indicator of cardiorespiratory fitness in young and clinical populations who cannot achieve maximal effort during a graded exercise test. However, OUES accuracy depends on the data points used for its calculation and it is still not clear if the submaximal OUES can accurately assess CRF in healthy young males. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the association between peak oxygen uptake and peak and submaximal OUES, and the agreement between submaximal OUES and peak OUES in male adolescents and young adults. METHODS: In this cross-sectional, observational study, fifty normal weight healthy participants (age 14-22 years, peak oxygen uptake 43.8 ± 7.3 mL·min(-1)·kg(-1)) performed a graded exercise test on a cycle ergometer and pulmonary gas exchange was assessed using breath-by-breath analysis. Peak oxygen uptake, and oxygen consumption at the aerobic and at the anaerobic threshold were determined as the 30-s average of the oxygen consumption values. Peak OUES (up to peak) and submaximal OUES (up to the aerobic and anaerobic thresholds) were calculated from the logarithmic relation between oxygen consumption and pulmonary ventilation. RESULTS: Very strong correlations were observed between peak oxygen uptake and peak OUES (r = 0.80-0.88) while fair-to-very strong correlations were observed between the peak oxygen uptake and the two submaximal OUES (r = 0.32-0.81). The level of agreement between peak OUES and OUES up to the anaerobic threshold (r = 0.89-0.93; Typical percentage error 6%; Intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.89-0.93) was greater than the one between the peak oxygen uptake with OUES up to the aerobic threshold (r = 0.39-0.56; Typical percentage error 15%; Intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.38-0.56). CONCLUSIONS: . The peak OUES is a better indicator of aerobic fitness than the OUES up to the anaerobic threshold in healthy, young males. The OUES up to the anaerobic threshold is a valid alternative to peak OUES.