Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Coagulation activation and inflammatory derangements are key characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Aspirin therapy in patients with COVID-19 remains uncertain due to conflicting evidence regarding its ability to balance anti-inflammatory and antithrombotic benefits against potential bleeding risks in the context of COVID-19-associated coagulopathy. This study aimed to compare the clinical safety and efficacy of aspirin in patients with COVID-19 in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: In the present systematic review and meta-analysis, the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for RCTs from database inception to January 13, 2023. Data were independently extracted and screened by two authors using structured data collection forms based on published reports. Results were calculated using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) with the Mantel-Haenszel method. Quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. The main outcomes were short-term all-cause mortality, bleeding events and any thrombosis events. This meta-analysis was registered on PROSPERO. RESULTS: A total of 922 studies were identified. Finally, six RCTs with low risk of bias were pooled in the analysis. The results showed that aspirin use was not associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality (OR = 0.95, 95% CI [0.88-1.03], I(2) = 0%) or the risk of any thrombosis (RR 0.88, 95% CI [0.77-1.01], I(2) = 0%), but aspirin use was associated with a higher risk of bleeding (OR 1.72, 95% CI [1.32-2.24], I(2) = 0%). No obvious risk of bias was found among the included RCTs for the primary outcome. CONCLUSION: Routine low-dose aspirin use does not reduce the risk of short-term mortality and risk of any thrombosis but increases the risk of bleeding. The data does not support the use of low-dose aspirin in patients with COVID-19.