Safety and risk factors of PICC insertion in hematologic malignancy patients with thrombocytopenia: a retrospective study

血液系统恶性肿瘤合并血小板减少症患者经外周静脉置入中心静脉导管的安全性和危险因素:一项回顾性研究

阅读:1

Abstract

Hematology patients often have severe thrombocytopenia and coagulation dysfunction. Despite the risk of bleeding, PICC insertion is still needed to reduce chemotherapy-related adverse reactions. Currently, there are no definitive indicators for predicting whether PICC placement increases bleeding risk in these patients. Additionally, large-scale studies on the safety of PICC insertion in hematology-oncology patients with platelet counts ≤ 50 × 10⁹/L and/or coagulation abnormalities are lacking. To evaluate the safety of PICC insertion in hematological oncology patients with a platelet concentration ≤ 50 × 10⁹/L and/or coagulation dysfunction through a large-sample retrospective study and to identify risk factors for bleeding after PICC placement. We retrospectively analyzed 1511 hematological patients with a platelet count ≤ 50 × 10⁹/L who underwent PICC insertion from February 2017 to January 2020, focusing on risk factors for bleeding within 24 h post-insertion. Multivariate analysis identified independent risk factors for bleeding within 24 h after PICC insertion as PT ≥ 13 s, platelet count ≤ 25 × 10⁹/L, and ADL score ≤ 95 points. Based on these three risk factors, patients were divided into low-risk (0-1 risk factors, 1% bleeding rate) and high-risk (≥ 2 risk factors, 7% bleeding rate) groups. When 0-1 risk factors are present, PICC insertion is safe even for patients with low platelet counts. If ≥ 2 risk factors exist, the decision to insert a PICC should consider the patient's clinical symptoms and needs. Blood product intervention does not affect the bleeding rate.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。