Abstract
BACKGROUND: General guidelines describing the potential indications and contraindications of Fresh Frozen Plasma (FFP) exist. However, their implementation is inadequate, leading to inappropriate use in various clinical settings. This study aims to define the appropriateness of the FFP usage in terms of therapeutic versus prophylactic indications. METHODS: Retrospective audit was conducted over one year prior to and after an educational intervention (1122 patients for 6072 FFP units and 1061 patients for 4858 FFP units, respectively). Clinical diagnosis, indication for FFP transfusion, and coagulation profile were noted, and episodes of transfusion were divided into appropriate and inappropriate based on the guidelines of the British Committee for Standards in Hematology (2004 reviewed in 2018) and College of American Pathologists (1994). RESULTS: Initial audit found 51.8% of FFP transfusions to be inappropriate (3069 of 5922). Coagulation profile (with INR values less than 1.5 times of the normal) was the most common cause of inappropriate transfusion (15.08%). 56.7% of FFP were prophylactically transfused. Re-audit after educational interventions showed a 22.3% reduction in the number of inappropriate transfusions. CONCLUSION: Inappropriate, as well as high prophylactic usage of FFP, was noticed in the initial audit, which reduced significantly after educational interventions. Regular CMEs, interactive sessions with clinicians, functioning Hospital Transfusion Committees, and prospective audits can affirm, further improve and reinforce the existing Hospital Transfusion Guidelines.