Abstract
BACKGROUND: The gap between the demand and supply of donor livers is still a considerable challenge. Since static cold storage is not sufficient in marginal livers, machine perfusion is being explored as an alternative. The objective of this study was to assess (dual) hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE/D-HOPE) and normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) in contrast to static cold storage (SCS). METHODS: Three databases were searched to identify studies about machine perfusion. Graft and patient survival and postoperative complications were evaluated using the random effects model. RESULTS: the incidence of biliary complications was lower in HOPE vs. SCS (OR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.36-0.98, p = 0.04, I(2): 0%). There was no significant difference in biliary complications between NMP and SCS (OR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.41-1.40, p = 0.38, I(2): 55%). Graft and patient survival were significantly better in HOPE than in SCS (HR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.23-0.71, p = 0.002, I(2): 0%) and (pooled HR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.20-0.93, p = 0.03, I(2): 0%). Graft and patient survival were not significantly different between NMP and SCS. CONCLUSION: HOPE/D-HOPE and NMP are promising alternatives to SCS for donor liver preservation. They may help address the widening gap between the demand for and availability of donor livers by enabling the rescue and transplantation of marginal livers.