Comparison of protective efficacy of subcutaneous versus intranasal immunization of mice with a Brucella melitensis lipopolysaccharide subunit vaccine

比较皮下注射和鼻内注射布鲁氏菌脂多糖亚单位疫苗对小鼠的保护效力

阅读:1

Abstract

Groups of mice were immunized either subcutaneously or intranasally with purified Brucella melitensis lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or with LPS as a noncovalent complex with Neisseria meningitidis group B outer membrane protein (LPS-GBOMP). Control mice were inoculated with sterile saline. Two doses of vaccine were given 4 weeks apart. Mice were challenged intranasally with virulent B. melitensis strain 16M 4 weeks after the second dose of vaccine. Sera, spleens, lungs, and livers of mice were harvested 8 weeks after challenge. The bacterial loads in the organs were determined by culture on brucella agar plates. Protective efficacy was determined by comparing the clearance of bacteria from organs of immunized mice with the clearance of bacteria from organs of control mice. At 8 weeks postchallenge there was significant protection from disseminated infection of spleens and livers of mice intranasally immunized with either vaccine compared to infection of control mice (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in clearance of bacteria from the lungs of immunized mice and control mice. However, mice immunized subcutaneously with either LPS or LPS-GBOMP vaccine showed significant protection against infection of the spleen (P < 0.001), liver (P < 0.001), and lungs (P < 0.05). These results show that intranasal immunization of mice with either vaccine provided significant protection against disseminated infection of the spleen and liver but subcutaneous immunization of mice with the vaccines conferred significant protection against infection of the spleen, liver, and lungs.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。