Abstract
Traumatic brain injuries (TBI) resulting from head impacts are a major public health concern, which prompted our research to investigate the complex relationship between the material properties of brain tissue and the severity of TBI. The goal of this research is to investigate how variations in brain and skull density influence the vulnerability of brain tissue to traumatic injury, thereby enhancing our understanding of injury mechanism. To achieve this goal, we employed a well-validated finite element head model (FEHM). The current investigation was divided into two phases: in the first one, three distinct brain viscoelastic materials that had been utilized in prior studies were analyzed. The review of the properties of these three materials has been meticulous, encompassing both the spectrum of mechanical properties and the behaviors that are relevant to the way in which brain tissue reacts to traumatic loading conditions. In the second phase, the material properties of both the brain and skull tissue, alongside the impact conditions, were held constant. After this step, the focus was directed towards the variation of density in the brain and skull, which was consistent with the results obtained from previous experimental investigations, in order to determine the precise impact of these variations in density. This approach allowed a more profound comprehension of the impacts that density had on the simulation results. In the first phase, Material No. 2 exhibited the highest maximum first principal strain value in the frontal region (εmax = 15.41%), indicating lower stiffness to instantaneous deformation. This characteristic suggests that Material No. 2 may deform more extensively upon impact, potentially increasing the risk of injury due to its viscoelastic behavior. In contrast, Material No. 1, with a lower maximum first principal strain in the frontal region (εmax = 7.87%), displayed greater stiffness to instantaneous deformation, potentially reducing the risk of brain injury upon head impact. The second phase provided quantitative findings revealing a proportional relationship between brain tissue density and the pressures experienced by the brain. A 2 % increase in brain tissue density corresponded to approximately a 1 % increase in pressure on the brain tissue. Similarly, changes in skull density exhibited a similar quantitative relationship, with a 6 % increase in skull density leading to a 2.5 % increase in brain pressure. This preliminary approximate ratio of 2 to 1 between brain and skull density variations provides an initial quantitative framework for assessing the impact of density changes on brain vulnerability. These findings have several implications for the development of protective measures and injury prevention strategies, particularly in contexts where head trauma is a major issue.