Abstract
BackgroundMoral distress (MD), the notion of not being permitted to act in a morally and ethically correct manner, is evident amongst oncologists caring for terminally ill patients. Oncologists often contend with complex decisions, such as withholding treatment and managing family distress. Sociocultural and individual considerations also influence an oncologist's perception of MD, which can vary in severity due to changing ethical, practical, clinical, moral and professional considerations and shifting contextual circumstances. Their impact compromises an oncologist's wellbeing, patient outcomes and care of their family. Recent data suggests long-term consequences to MD and alludes to a broader cost of caring that encompasses compassion fatigue, vicarious trauma, secondary traumatic stress and burnout.MethodsThis study aims to determine how oncologists in Singapore experience MD and the costs of caring through secondary analysis of interviews with 12 oncologists.ResultsAnalysis of the interview transcripts revealed the following domains: 1) sources of MD; 2) sources of the costs of caring; and 3) protective factors.ConclusionThis secondary analysis of Singaporean oncologists suggests that MD is not frequently an isolated experience; rather, it leads to growing distress amongst oncologists-contributing to a wider cost of caring. This then impacts oncologists' decisioning, actions, practice and career trajectories. Longitudinal structured training, establishing personalised support for all oncologists and creating a safe working environment supported by the host organisation are thus critical to ensure sustainable practice.