Abstract
BACKGROUND: To comprehensively investigate the behaviors of oncologists with different working experiences and institute group styles in deep learning-based organs-at-risk (OAR) contouring. METHODS: A deep learning-based contouring system (DLCS) was modeled from 188 CT datasets of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in institute A. Three institute oncology groups, A, B, and C, were included; each contained a beginner and an expert. For each of the 28 OARs, two trials were performed with manual contouring first and post-DLCS edition later, for ten test cases. Contouring performance and group consistency were quantified by volumetric and surface Dice coefficients. A volume-based and a surface-based oncologist satisfaction rate (VOSR and SOSR) were defined to evaluate the oncologists' acceptance of DLCS. RESULTS: Based on DLCS, experience inconsistency was eliminated. Intra-institute consistency was eliminated for group C but still existed for group A and group B. Group C benefits most from DLCS with the highest number of improved OARs (8 for volumetric Dice and 10 for surface Dice), followed by group B. Beginners obtained more numbers of improved OARs than experts (7 v.s. 4 in volumetric Dice and 5 v.s. 4 in surface Dice). VOSR and SOSR varied for institute groups, but the rates of beginners were all significantly higher than those of experts for OARs with experience group significance. A remarkable positive linear relationship was found between VOSR and post-DLCS edition volumetric Dice with a coefficient of 0.78. CONCLUSIONS: The DLCS was effective for various institutes and the beginners benefited more than the experts.