Abstract
Real-world success rate of liquid and tissue-based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is unknown. We analyzed real-world pan-tumor cohorts that underwent CGP during clinical care via FoundationOne CDx (F1CDx) and FoundationOne Liquid CDx (F1LCDx) to determine tissue and liquid sample adequacy based on tumor type. Pan-tumor presequencing adequacy was high (>90%) by both tissue-based F1CDx (median: 92.3%; range: 88.2%-96.9%) and liquid-based F1LCDx (median: 94.8%; range: 86.6%-96.7%). Similarly, postsequencing analysis revealed that most tissue and liquid samples yielded successful sequencing results with a median sequencing success rate of 97.9% and 98.1% for F1CDx and F1LCDx, respectively. One exception is central nervous system (CNS) tumors, for which F1CDx had dramatically higher sample sufficiency (96.9%) and postsequencing success rate (97.0%) compared with F1LCDx (86.6% and 92.9%, respectively). The pan-tumor median sample-to-success rate was 90.4% (range: 84.8%-94.4%) for F1CDx. The equivalent rate for F1LCDx was slightly higher at 93.2% (range: 80.4%-95.7%). Conversely, when examining the prevalence of F1LCDx results with high tumor fraction (TF≥1%), the sample-to-high TF results rate was dramatically lower (median: 37.7%, range: 2.1% [CNS tumors]-46.0%). In conclusion, except in CNS tumors or when accounting for liquid TF, success rates of F1CDx and F1LCDx are equivalently high. These results may guide informed decision on when to pursue tissue vs liquid testing of patients with cancer.