Artificial Intelligence in Patient Blood Management: A Systematic Review of Predictive, Diagnostic, and Decision Support Applications

人工智能在患者血液管理中的应用:预测、诊断和决策支持应用的系统性综述

阅读:1

Abstract

Background: Patient blood management (PBM) is a patient-centered, evidence-based approach for optimizing anemia management, minimizing blood loss, and ensuring appropriate transfusion. Artificial intelligence (AI) provides powerful tools for prediction, diagnosis, and decision support across PBM, but current evidence remains emerging and not yet consolidated. Objectives: This review synthesizes AI applications in PBM, summarizing predictive, diagnostic, and decision support models; highlighting methodological trends; and discussing challenges for clinical translation. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from inception to 31 March 2025. Eligible studies reported AI models addressing the three established PBM pillars. Studies on transfusion safety and blood bank operations relevant to PBM were also included. Extracted data covered study characteristics, predictors, models, validation strategies, and performance. The findings were narratively synthesized given study heterogeneity. Results: A total of 338 studies were included, spanning anemia detection, bleeding risk stratification, transfusion prediction, transfusion safety, and inventory management. Deep learning (DL) predominated in image-based anemia detection, while ensemble and gradient boosting methods frequently outperformed baselines in bleeding and transfusion risk prediction. Recurrent and hybrid architectures proved effective for blood supply forecasting. Across domains, machine learning and DL models generally surpassed logistic regression, clinical scores, and expert judgment. Despite strong internal performance, external validation and clinical deployment remain limited. Conclusions: AI is advancing PBM by enabling earlier anemia detection, more accurate bleeding and transfusion prediction, and smarter resource allocation. Translation into practice requires standardized reporting, robust external validation, explainability, and workflow integration. Future work should emphasize multimodal learning, prospective evaluation, and cost-effectiveness.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。