Abstract
The diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) traditionally requires calculation of the ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO(2)/FiO(2)) using arterial blood, which can be costly and is not possible in many resource-limited settings. By contrast, pulse oximetry is continuously available, accurate, inexpensive, and non-invasive. Pulse oximetry-based indices, such as the ratio of pulse-oximetric oxygen saturation to FiO(2) (SpO(2)/FiO(2)), have been validated in clinical studies for the diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with ARDS. Limitations of the SpO(2)/FiO(2) ratio include reduced accuracy in poor perfusion states or above oxygen saturations of 97%, and the potential for reduced accuracy in patients with darker skin pigmentation. Application of pulse oximetry to the diagnosis and management of ARDS, including formal adoption of the SpO(2)/FiO(2) ratio as an alternative to PaO(2)/FiO(2) to meet the diagnostic criterion for hypoxaemia in ARDS, could facilitate increased and earlier recognition of ARDS worldwide to advance both clinical practice and research.