Abstract
Laboratory mice are instrumental for preclinical research but there are serious concerns that the use of a clean standardized environment for specific-pathogen-free (SPF) mice results in poor bench-to-bedside translation due to their immature immune system. The aim of the present study was to test the importance of the gut microbiota in wild vs. SPF mice for evaluating host immune responses in a house-dust-mite-induced allergic airway inflammation model without the influence of pathogens. The wild mouse microbiome reduced histopathological changes and TNF-α in the lungs and serum when transplanted to microbiota-depleted mice compared to mice transplanted with the microbiome from SPF mice. Moreover, the colonic gene expression of Gata3 was significantly lower in the wild microbiome-associated mice, whereas Muc1 was more highly expressed in both the ileum and colon. Intestinal microbiome and metabolomic analyses revealed distinct profiles associated with the wild-derived microbiome. The wild-mouse microbiome thus partly reduced sensitivity to house-dust-mite-induced allergic airway inflammation compared to the SPF mouse microbiome, and preclinical studies using this model should consider using both 'dirty' rewilded and SPF mice for testing new therapeutic compounds due to the significant effects of their respective microbiomes and derived metabolites on host immune responses.