Conclusions
The present results indicate that impulsive choice for cocaine is reduced by PRO in females and by ATO in males. These findings suggest both treatments may be an effective intervention in treating cocaine abuse, but that their effectiveness differs by sex.
Objective
The current study assessed sex differences in the effects of PRO, ATO, and their combination in a delay discounting paradigm for cocaine and for sucrose pellets. Method: Male and female rats chose between a small-immediate or a large-delayed (0, 7.5, 15, 30, 60 s) outcome in an impulsive choice procedure for sucrose pellets (1 vs. 3 pellets) or for iv cocaine infusions (0.3 vs. 0.9 mg/kg). Following baseline assessment of impulsive choice, rats received daily treatment of vehicle (VEH), PRO (0.5 mg/kg), ATO (1.5 mg/kg), or a combination (PRO + ATO) until a second assessment of impulsive choice was determined.
Results
Compared to the VEH group, females were less impulsive for cocaine following PRO or the PRO + ATO combined treatment, whereas males were less impulsive for cocaine following ATO. No treatment effects were observed on impulsive choice for sucrose pellets. Conclusions: The present results indicate that impulsive choice for cocaine is reduced by PRO in females and by ATO in males. These findings suggest both treatments may be an effective intervention in treating cocaine abuse, but that their effectiveness differs by sex.