Abstract
Although decades of intensive drug discovery efforts to treat neurodegenerative disorders (NDs) have failed, around half a million patients in more than 2000 studies continue being tested, costing over USD 100 billion, despite the conclusion that even those drugs which have been approved have no better effect than a placebo. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has established multiple programs to innovate the treatment of rare diseases, particularly NDs, providing millions of USD in funding primarily by encouraging novel clinical trials to account for issues related to study sizes and adopting multi-arm studies to account for patient dropouts. Instead, the FDA should focus on the primary reason for failure: the poor bioavailability of drugs reaching the brain (generally 0.1% at most) due to the blood-brain barrier (BBB). There are several solutions to enhance entry into the brain, and the FDA must require proof of significant entry into the brain as the prerequisite to approving Investigational New Drug (IND) applications. The FDA should also rely on factors other than biomarkers to confirm efficacy, as these are rarely relevant to clinical use. This study summarizes how the drugs used to treat NDs can be made effective and how the FDA should change its guidelines for IND approval of these drugs.